Detection of chromoluminance patterns on chromoluminance pedestals II: model

Citation
Cc. Chen et al., Detection of chromoluminance patterns on chromoluminance pedestals II: model, VISION RES, 40(7), 2000, pp. 789-803
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
VISION RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00426989 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
789 - 803
Database
ISI
SICI code
0042-6989(2000)40:7<789:DOCPOC>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
A model for chromoluminance pattern detection and pedestal effects is descr ibed. This model has five stages. The stimulus is first processed by the co ne array and then by color-spatial linear operators. The outputs of the lin ear operators may be expressed as weighted sums of cone contrasts over spac e. There are three opposite sign-pairs of linear spatial operators in the m odel. Their spectral:tuning at each point in space is similar to the lumina nce, green/red and blue/yellow mechanisms in color opponent models, but the ir sensitivity to cone inputs varies as a function of space. The operators in each pair are the same except that the signs of the cone inputs in one a re the opposite of those in the other. A non-linear response operator follo ws each linear operator. It receives two inputs, one excitatory and the oth er divisive inhibitory. The excitatory input is the half-wave rectified out put of one of the linear operators. The inhibitory input is a non-linear su m of all linear operator outputs. The non-linear response operator raises t he excitatory input to a power, and divides it by the inhibitory input plus a constant to produce the response. The detection variable is computed by combining the difference in response to target-plus-pedestal and pedestal a lone across the three non-linear operators. The model accounts well for the large data set presented in the companion paper and is generally consisten t with other results in the literature. The spectral sensitivities of,the i nferred chromoluminance pattern mechanisms are similar to those obtained wi th different methods. The data set is shown to be inconsistent with several other models. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.