Airflow visualization in the workplace to assess containment, ventilation,
or general air movements is often carried out using smoke tracers. The most
prevalent method uses a disposable smoke tube that generates a plume of co
ncentrated sulfuric acid fume. However, use of the smoke tube exposes occup
ational hygienists to the risk of sulfuric acid exposure through inhalation
or dermal contact, as well as injury from sharps. Following concern over t
he potential health hazard associated with smoke tube usage, alternative fl
ow visualization methods and technologies have been reviewed. Methods of ge
nerating smoke or bubbles other than using smoke tubes suitable for visuali
zing air movements include heated element smoke generators, combustion gene
rators, generation of metallic chlorides and ammonium chloride, generation
of neutral density bubbles, and water fog generation, Some of these methods
are applicable in specific workplace situations. However, there is no comm
ercially available smoke or bubble generator currently available that match
es the smoke tube for cost effectiveness, ease of use, and wide applicabili
ty, while also reducing the potential health risks associated with smoke tu
be usage. Despite this, certain technologies, in particular water/glycerol
smoke generation using heated element generators, have the potential to be
developed into viable alternatives to the smoke tube. Thus, with further de
velopment, an air movement visualization method that poses a significantly
lower health hazard than the smoke tube is feasible.