Gl. Warren et al., ECCENTRIC CONTRACTION-INDUCED INJURY IN NORMAL AND HINDLIMB-SUSPENDEDMOUSE SOLEUS AND EDL MUSCLES, Journal of applied physiology, 77(3), 1994, pp. 1421-1430
The primary objective of this study was to compare the magnitude of in
jury in mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles induc
ed by high-force eccentric contractions. A second objective was to stu
dy the effect of altering the daily loading of the muscles through hin
dlimb suspension (HS) on the injury. One of two protocols was performe
d in vitro: 1) 15 eccentric contractions (n = 20: 10 EDL and 10 soleus
muscles) or 2) 15 isometric contractions (n = 20: 10 EDL and 10 soleu
s muscles). After the protocol, the decrements in contractile performa
nce and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release were measured at 15-min in
tervals over 1 h. Immediately after the eccentric contraction protocol
, markedly greater decrements in maximal isometric tetanic force (P-o)
occurred in the normal EDL than in the normal soleus muscles (60.7 +/
- 4.2 vs. 7.6 +/- 2.1%, P less than or equal to 0.0001). LDH release i
mmediately after the eccentric contraction protocol was 2.7-fold great
er in the normal EDL than in the normal soleus muscles. To investigate
the role of recent loading of the muscles in the injury, EDL (n = 9)
and soleus (n = 10) muscles from mice subjected to HS for 14 days perf
ormed the eccentric contraction protocol. HS resulted in greater decre
ments in contractile performance for the soleus muscles (decreases in
P-o immediately after the protocol for HS and normal soleus muscles we
re 31.0 +/- 1.8 and 7.6 +/- 2.1%, respectively; P less than or equal t
o 0.0001) but not for the EDL muscles. HS resulted in a 76% greater LD
H release in the soleus muscle but had no effect on LDH release by the
EDL muscle. HS did not alter the histochemically determined fiber typ
e composition of the soleus muscle. The data demonstrate that EDL musc
les are more susceptible than soleus muscles to eccentric contraction-
induced injury in normal weight-bearing mice; part of the explanation
for the difference appears to be the greater previous loading of the s
oleus muscle rather than the fiber type composition per se.