Immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) analysis of archival tumors with deletion, hypermethylation, or mutation of the CDKN2/MTS1 gene - A comparison of fourcommercial antibodies
J. Geradts et al., Immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) analysis of archival tumors with deletion, hypermethylation, or mutation of the CDKN2/MTS1 gene - A comparison of fourcommercial antibodies, APPL IMMUNO, 8(1), 2000, pp. 71-79
The MTS1/CDKN2/p16 gene encoding the p16(INK4a) tumor-suppressor protein is
commonly inactivated by homozygous deletion Or hypermethylation of the pro
moter in a wide range of human malignancies. In select tumor types, includi
ng pancreatic adenocarcinomas, intragenic mutations are found in a signific
ant percentage of cases. The immunoreactivity of mutant p16 proteins has no
t been comprehensively studied. Moreover, the immunohistochemical propertie
s of commercially available antibodies have not been described in detail. W
e studied 35 pancreatic adenocarcinomas with a molecularly defined p16 stat
us (16 homozygous deletions, 3 hypermethylated cases, and 16 tumors with an
intragenic mutation in one allele associated with loss of the second allel
e). In addition, we studied nine cell lines (three homozygous deletions, th
ree hypermethylated lines, and three intragenic mutations). Paraffin sectio
ns of the tumors and cell blocks were reacted with four different anti-p16
antibodies: polyclonal and monoclonal (clone G175-405) antibodies from Phar
Mingen, monoclonal antibody DCS-50 from Oncogene Science, and monoclonal an
tibody ZJ11 from Neo-Markers. Optimal staining conditions were established
for each antibody. The pancreatic carcinomas with homozygous p16 deletions
were largely devoid of nuclear staining (admixed nonneoplastic cells served
as internal positive controls); only one adenocarcinoma each reacted with
DCS-50 and the polyclonal antibody, and five were positive with ZJ11, sugge
sting that nonspecific nuclear staining can occur under certain conditions.
Antibody DCS-50 produced nuclear staining in all three hypermethylated car
cinomas, whereas G175-405 stained none of them. Three of the four antibodie
s produced nuclear immunoreactivity in 7 to 14 of the 16 carcinomas carryin
g p16 mutations; G175-405 showed only weak reactivity in one case; Cytoplas
mic staining was present in all carcinomas and cell lines and with all anti
bodies and therefore cannot be considered specific; it was strongest with G
175-405. Thus, we found antibody G175-405 to be the most specific, and mono
clonals DCS-50 and ZJ11 the least specific for wild-type p16. However, the
former tends to give stronger cytoplasmic background staining. For tumor ty
pes in which p16 mutations are uncommon, the PharMingen polyclonal antibody
may be a suitable alternative.