Sensorineural hearing loss and prematurity

Citation
Es. Marlow et al., Sensorineural hearing loss and prematurity, ARCH DIS CH, 82(2), 2000, pp. F141-F144
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
ISSN journal
00039888 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
F141 - F144
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(200003)82:2<F141:SHLAP>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective-To elucidate clinical antecedents of sensorineural hearing loss ( SNHL) in very preterm infants. Design-Case-control study. Subjects-Fifteen children <33 weeks' gestation with significant SNHL born b etween 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1994, detected within 9 months of bir th, and 30 matched control children. Methodology-Perinatal variables in the two groups were compared using nonpa rametric tests and conditional logistic regression (EGRET). Results-Median birth weight for the index group was 960 g (range 600-2914 g ) compared with 1026 g (range 410-2814 g) for controls. Children with SNHL had longer periods of intubation, ventilation, oxygen treatment, and acidos is, and more frequent treatment with dopamine or frusemide. Neither peak no r trough aminoglycoside levels,nor duration of jaundice or level of bilirub in varied between groups. However, SNHL was more likely if peak bilirubin l evels coexisted with netilmicin use (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1 4.2 (1.8 to 113.6)) or if acidosis occurred when bilirubin levels were over 200 mu mol/l (OR 8.0 (0.9 to 71.6). Frusemide use in the face of high seru m creatinine levels (OR 8.9 (1.1 to 74.5)) or netilmicin treatment (OR 5.0 (0.99 to 24.8)) was also associated with SNHL. At 12 months of age, seven o f 15 children with SNHL had evidence of cerebral palsy compared with two of 30 controls (OR 12.3 (2.1 to 71)). Conclusions-Preterm children with SNHL required more intensive care in the perinatal period and developed more neurological complications than control s. Among very preterm babies, the coexistence of risk factors for hearing l oss may be more important than the individual factors themselves.