Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and etoposide followed by mitotane at disease progression in patients with locally advanced or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma - A Southwest Oncology Group study
Sk. Williamson et al., Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and etoposide followed by mitotane at disease progression in patients with locally advanced or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma - A Southwest Oncology Group study, CANCER, 88(5), 2000, pp. 1159-1165
BACKGROUND. A previous Southwest Oncology Group study demonstrated a 30% re
sponse rate with the combination of cisplatin and mitotane in the treatment
of patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Several case reports
suggested that the combination of etoposide and cisplatin may be an active
regimen in this disease. Because of these reports of potential activity, t
he authors conducted a Phase II trial evaluating the combination of etoposi
de and cisplatin. Due to the lack of data regarding the objective response
rates to mitotane, the authors planned to evaluate the response rate to mit
otane after disease progression on etoposide and cisplatin in patients with
no prior mitotane therapy.
METHODS. Patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic adrenocortical
carcinoma with objectively measurable disease or biochemical abnormalities
received cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2), intravenously on Days 1 and 2, and etoposi
de, 100 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 2, and 3. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. A
t the time of disease progression, patients who had not previously received
mitotane received 1000 mg orally 4 times a day along with cortisone acetat
e and fludrocortisone acetate.
RESULTS. Of the 47 patients entered onto the study, 45 were eligible. Nine
patients had received mitotane previously and 36 had not. Objective respons
es were noted in 11% of patients (5 of 45 patients) (95% confidence interva
l, 3.7-24%). The median survival was 10 months. The most common to;dc effec
ts were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neurologic. Only 16 patients wit
h no prior mitotane therapy went on to receive mitotane at the time of dise
ase progression. An objective response was noted in 13% of patients (2 of 1
6 patients). The most common toxic effects were edema and gastrointestinal
effects.
CONCLUSIONS. The current study demonstrates that the combination of cisplat
in and etoposide has minimal activity in advanced and metastatic adrenocort
ical carcinoma and other treatment strategies are warranted. (C) 2000 Ameri
can Cancer Society.