The acute coronary syndrome diagnosis and prognostic evaluation by troponin I is influenced by the test system affinity to different troponin complexes

Citation
M. Mockel et al., The acute coronary syndrome diagnosis and prognostic evaluation by troponin I is influenced by the test system affinity to different troponin complexes, CLIN CHIM A, 293(1-2), 2000, pp. 139-155
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
ISSN journal
00098981 → ACNP
Volume
293
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
139 - 155
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-8981(200003)293:1-2<139:TACSDA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
It was suggested recently that cardiac troponins are released as T-I-C comp lexes and then further degraded to T and I-C. It is not known whether the v arious affinity to the T-I-C and I-C complex of different troponin T test s ystems influence the diagnostic and prognostic value of the test results in clinical practice. We studied 162 patients (61.3 S.D. 11.1 years) with sus pected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a single center study. AMI was confirmed in 109 patients. Blood samples were taken at admission, after 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. Troponin I (TnI) was measured using the OPUS(R) plus (TnI-O, cut-off 1.6 mu g/l) and the Stratus(R) II (TnI-S, cut-off 1.5 mu g/ l) analyzers. TnI-O has high affinity to the binary (I-C) and TnI-S to the ternary (T-I-C) troponin complex. A 6-month follow-up with respect to death and recurrent AMI was performed. The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for AMI diagnosis were 82.6 and 86.8% for TnI-S; 75.2 and 92.5% for TnI-O 0-2 h after admission. The ROC analysis showed a slightly better curve for TnI-S at 4 h (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis shows prediction of 6 months outcome by 0-24 h serial TnI-S measurements (odds ratio 5.21, P = 0 .0356), and serial TnI-O measurements (odds ratio 4.92. P = 0.0186). High a ffinity to the ternary troponin complex enhances the diagnostic but not the prognostic value of a test system. Indeed, the resulting differences are s mall but underline the need for standardization of biochemical markers. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.