Comparison of simple neural networks and nonlinear regression models for descriptive modeling of Lactobacillus helveticus growth in pH-controlled batch, cultures
Aw. Schepers et al., Comparison of simple neural networks and nonlinear regression models for descriptive modeling of Lactobacillus helveticus growth in pH-controlled batch, cultures, ENZYME MICR, 26(5-6), 2000, pp. 431-445
A set of 20 Lactobacillus helveticus growth curves was obtained from pH-con
trolled batch cultures with different pH setpoints, whey permeate and yeast
extract concentrations. To find the best descriptive model of the biomass
concentration versus time (y = X(t)) growth curve, fitting results of a lar
ge number of models were compared with statistical and approximate methods.
Models studied included simple neural networks, reparameterized Logistic,
Gompertz, Richards, Schnute, Weibull, and Morgan-Mercier-Flodin models, Amr
ane-Prigent model, and four new models based on autonomous growth functions
. Simple neural networks with only four weights were good descriptive model
s-of the growth curves and fitting qualities were similar to those of the b
est existing four-parameter models, such as the Logistic model. However, me
aningful parameters had to be calculated numerically and use of simple neur
al networks yielded no distinctive advantages over other models. A new five
-parameter model, based on an autonomous growth function, yielded the best
fitting results, even when the number of model parameters was accounted for
in the comparisons. However, the maximum specific growth rate was not alwa
ys well estimated. Therefore the five-parameter Richards model was chosen a
s the best descriptive model of the growth curve. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science
Inc. All rights reserved.