Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography
Jj. Piek et al., Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography, EUR HEART J, 21(6), 2000, pp. 466-474
Aims Evaluation of angiographical and intracoronary Doppler-derived paramet
ers of coronary stenosis severity.
Methods and Results A total of 225 patients with one-vessel disease were st
udied before PTCA and at 6 months follow-up. Exercise electrocardiography w
as performed to document presence (n=157) or absence (n=138) of an ST segme
nt shift (greater than or equal to 0.1 mV). Intracoronary blood flow veloci
ty analysis was performed to determine the proximal/distal flow velocity ra
tio, the distal diastolic/systolic flow velocity ratio and coronary flow ve
locity reserve. Receiver operator characteristic curves were calculated to
assess the predictive value of these variables compared with the exercise t
est. The distal coronary flow velocity reserve demonstrated the best linear
correlation for both percentage diameter stenosis and minimum lumen diamet
er (r=0.67 and r=0.66; P<0.01), compared to the diastolic/systolic flow vel
ocity ratio (r=0.19 and r=0.14; P<0.01) and the proximal/distal flow veloci
ty ratio (r=0.03 and r=0.07; not significant). The areas under the curve we
re 0.84 +/- 0.02; 0.82 +/- 0.03 and 0.83 +/- 0.03 for diameter stenosis, mi
nimum lumen diameter and coronary flow velocity reserve, respectively. Logi
stic regression analysis revealed that the percentage diameter stenosis or
minimum lumen diameter and coronary flow velocity reserve were independent
predictors for the result of stress testing.
Conclusions The distal coronary flow velocity reserve is the best intracoro
nary Doppler parameter for evaluation of coronary narrowings. Angiographica
l estimates of coronary lesion severity and distal coronary flow velocity r
eserve are good and independent predictors for the assessment of functional
severity of coronary stenosis, emphasizing the complementary role of these
parameters for clinical decision making. (C) 2000 The European Society of
Cardiology.