Use of alternative treatments by patients after surgery for gynecologic malignancies

Citation
J. Sehouli et al., Use of alternative treatments by patients after surgery for gynecologic malignancies, GEBURTSH FR, 60(3), 2000, pp. 147-154
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE
ISSN journal
00165751 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
147 - 154
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5751(200003)60:3<147:UOATBP>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: To determine how frequently patients with gynecologic cancers us e alternative cancer therapies, which types of alternative treatments are u sed, who recommends them, and differences between eastern and western Germa ny. Methods: A total of 445 patients at two Berlin hospitals were questioned ab out use of alternative treatments in semi-structured interviews. Results: Overall 20% of patients reported using alternative treatments. Bre ast cancer patients accounted for the largest group. There was no differenc e in mean age or history of recurrence, radiotherapy or chemotherapy betwee n patients who sought alternative treatments and those who did not. Self-em ployed or professional women used alternative treatments most frequently (3 3 %; p = 0.04). Patients after breast-sparing surgery used alternative ther apies more frequently than those after mastectomy (p = 0.02). Most (78%) of patients sought alternative treatments within 1 year of the primary diagno sis. Patients from the former West Germany used alternative treatments almo st twice as commonly as their counterparts from the former East Germany (27 % vs. 14%). Mistletoe (45%), vitamin (44%) and selenium (20%) preparations were the most commonly used. Most (56%) of patients using alternative metho ds reported that they had been recommended by physicians. Conclusions: Gynecologic cancer patients should be asked about use of alter native treatments.