In his trilogy about Henry IV (1997), Michael Peyramaure assumes that narra
ting the past is not problematic since human nature has not changed within
the last 400 years. Regarding the content of the novel, there is no plurali
ty of "Weltanschaung" which would correspond to the polyphony of the narrat
ive composition. This incongruity is due to the complex political conflict
between Protestants and Catholics which is transposed into simple moral opp
ositions like good and bad and therefore does not demand a special effort o
f attention by the reader. This kind of historical topic seems to suggest t
he use of Walter Scott's structure of narration in his historical novel Iva
nhoe, but the author, Peyramaure, does not follow it. However, he does not
even draw out attention to the fact that an incident like the St. Bartholom
ew Massacre in 1572 can only be narrated if the narrative principles of Sco
tt are not applied or at least in another way. If Peyramaure can be said to
benefit from any narrative convention at all, it is to be found in the rep
ertoire of naturalism.