Twenty-three years previously, a 32-year-old man underwent epicardial pacem
aker implantation with placement of the pulse generator in the pleural cavi
ty, this unusual pulse generator location necessary since his previous endo
cardial pacemaker had been complicated by recurrent erosion, migration and,
eventually, infection. Over two decades later, the pulse generator reached
end-of-life characteristics but the patient was unkeen to undergo:a thorac
otomy for box change. He underwent implantation of a new endocardial system
with implantation of the pulse generator subcutaneously in the left pector
al region. His original epicardial intra-pleural pulse generator was left i
n situ.