Multicentre, double-blind, comparison of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Citation
E. Mundo et al., Multicentre, double-blind, comparison of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, INT CLIN PS, 15(2), 2000, pp. 69-76
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
02681315 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
69 - 76
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1315(200003)15:2<69:MDCOFA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The aim of this prospectively randomized, double-blind, parallel group, mul ticentre study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder ( OCD) (DSM-III-R). Fourteen centres participated in this trial. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive fluvoxamine and 65 to receive clomipram ine. The duration of the study was 10 weeks. The two treatment groups showe d a marked improvement of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology, as determine d by the Yale-Brown obsessive-Compulsive Scale, the National Institute of M ental Health Obsessive-Compulsive Global Scale and Clinical Global Impressi on. No statistically significant differences were found between fluvoxamine and clomipramine in terms of efficacy during the study. A similar number o f patients in each group withdrew from the study prematurely, but there wer e more dropouts due to adverse events in the clomipramine group. Concerning tolerability, there were significantly more reports of constipation and dr y mouth in the clomipramine group. The results show that fluvoxamine and cl omipramine have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients suffering fro m OCD, but fluvoxamine is better tolerated. In view of the superior safety profile of fluvoxamine compared to clomipramine in terms of a risk-benefit assessment, the use of fluvoxamine would appear to be advantageous for this patient population. (C) 2000 Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.