The study compares two estimation methods for choice models with last choic
e feedback, using simulated and real data. The first method ignores the imp
act of unobserved heterogeneity on observed choices via presample choices,
while the second method approximates this impact by a stochastic relationsh
ip. In panels with less than 10 choices per panelist, the first method over
states the impact of last choice on current choice and understates the impa
ct of intrinsic preferences (i.e., brand intercepts). The second method per
forms significantly better than the first method. Under both methods, an in
crease in the number of heterogeneous coefficients in the model tends to in
crease the bias in the estimates. The largest bias occurs when lagged choic
e coefficients are heterogeneous. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights
reserved.