Hooked setae: tests of the anchor hypothesis

Citation
Ra. Merz et Sa. Woodin, Hooked setae: tests of the anchor hypothesis, INVERTEBR B, 119(1), 2000, pp. 67-82
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
INVERTEBRATE BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
10778306 → ACNP
Volume
119
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
67 - 82
Database
ISI
SICI code
1077-8306(2000)119:1<67:HSTOTA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that hooked setae function as anchors in three spe cies of tubiculous polychaetes (Eudistylia vancouveri, Shizobranchia insign is, and Owenia fusiformis). All maintained position within their tubes when exposed to high pressures (up to 100-200 kPa) applied from the posterior d irection (where it would tend to cause the tips of hooks to embed in the tu be wall). When pressure was applied in the opposite direction, where hooks would not tend to embed in the tube wall, the worms were expelled from thei r tubes at lower pressures (30-100 kPa). The ability of these worms to main tain their position within their tubes was independent of body size. On the basis of these findings we made three predictions. First, worms that use t heir hooked setae as anchors should have those hooks located on the body in greatest number and size on the segments associated with greatest worm dia meter. Second, as worms increase in size, setal armory should increase in a predictable way. The force that can be applied to extract worms from their tubes by suction feeding fish or wave action would increase as the area su bject to suction increases (proportional to the cross sectional area of the tube). Therefore, we predict that setal armory should also increase as a s quared function. Third, hooks or uncini should show patterns of wear or los s and/or the worms' bodies should show scars or wounds where the setae are most used (e.g., where worm diameter is at its maximum). All of these predi ctions were supported by the data and indicate that hooked setae function a s anchors for tubiculous polychaetes. This is important for understanding t he biology of these animals and has implications for using hooked setae as characters in phylogenetic analyses.