Transcriptional regulation of the human CYP1B1 gene - Evidence for involvement of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor response element in constitutive expression
Se. Shehin et al., Transcriptional regulation of the human CYP1B1 gene - Evidence for involvement of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor response element in constitutive expression, J BIOL CHEM, 275(10), 2000, pp. 6770-6776
The cytochrome P450 1B1 gene (CYP1B1) is expressed constitutively and is in
ducible by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the human breast a
denocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 but not in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2
, Genomic DNA isolated from both cell lines was digested with the methylati
on-sensitive restriction enzyme isoschizomers MspI and HpaII, and subjected
to Southern analysis with a probe for the CYP1B1 promoter/enhancer region.
Although differences were observed in methylation patterns for the CYP1B1
gene from MCF-7 and HepG2 cells, treatment with the demethylating agent 5-a
zacytidine (10 mu M for 6 days) did not activate CYP1B1 mRNA expression in
HepG2 cells. Furthermore, treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor
trichostatin A (100 nM for 24 h) did not activate CYP1B1 mRNA expression in
HepG2 cells. Comparative analysis of the constitutive expression of lucife
rase/1B1 reporter constructs containing a series of deletions in the 5' enh
ancer region indicated that in MCF-7 cells the region from -987 to -732 (re
lative to the transcription start site) was necessary for maximal levels of
activity. Mutation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor response elements (dio
xin response elements) in this region showed that the dioxin response eleme
nts located at -833 is essential for constitutive gene expression in MCF-7
cells. In HepG2 cells, reporter gene activity was at least equal or greater
than the activity observed in MCF-7 cells, which is in marked contrast to
the expression of the native CYYP1B1 gene. Taken together these findings in
dicate that the observed cell-specific differences in CYP1B1 constitutive e
xpression are not mediated by DNA promoter/enhancer methylation, but are li
kely due to either 1) inaccessibility of the 5'-enhancer region in HepG2 ce
lls to transcriptional activators due to a higher order chromatin structure
that does not involve histone acetylation, or 2) the action of a repressor
protein at cis-elements located outside of the -2296 to +25 region examine
d with the CYP1B1 reporter constructs. Furthermore, at least one of the dio
xin response elements in the enhancer region is required for constitutive e
xpression of CYP1B1.