Design of monocyclic (1-3) and dicyclic (1-3/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists

Citation
Je. Rivier et al., Design of monocyclic (1-3) and dicyclic (1-3/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, J MED CHEM, 43(5), 2000, pp. 797-806
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00222623 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
797 - 806
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2623(20000309)43:5<797:DOM(AD>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Careful analysis of the NMR structures of cyclo(4-10)[Ac-Delta(3)Pro(1),DFp a(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),DNal(6),Dpr(10)]-GnRH, dicyclo(4- 10/5 - 8)[Ac-DNal(1), DCpa(2),DTrp(3), Asp(4),Glu(5),DArg(6),Lys(8),Dpr(10)]GnRH, and dicyclo(4-1 0/5,5'-8)[Ac-DNa1,DCpa(2),DPal(3),Asp(4), Glu(5)(Gly),DArg(6),Dbu(8),Dpr(10 )]GnRH showed that, in the N-terminal tripeptide, a type II beta-turn aroun d residues 1 and 2 was probable along with a gamma-turn around DTrp(3)/DPal (3). This suggested the possibility of constraining the N-terminus by the i ntroduction of a cyclo(1-3) scaffold. Optimization of ring size and composi tion led to the discovery of cyclo(1-3)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (5, K-i = 0.82 nM), cyclo(1,1-'3)-[Ac-DAsp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DO rn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH(13, K-i = 0.34 nM), cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(b eta Ala),DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (20, K-i = 0.14 nM), and cyc lo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(beta Ala), DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (21, K-i = 0.17 nM), which inhibited ovulation significantly at doses equal to or lower than 25 mu g/rat. These results were particularly unexpected in vi ew of the critical role(s) originally ascribed to the side chains of residu es 1 and 3.(1) Other closely related analogues, such as those where the [DA sp(1)(beta Ala), DOrn(3)] cycle of 21 was changed to [DOrn(1)(beta Ala), DA sp(3)] of cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DOrn(1)(beta Ala),DCpa(2),DAsp(3),DNal(6),DAla(1 0)]GnRH (22, K-i = 2.2 nM) or where the size of the cycle was conserved and [DAsp(1)(beta Ala), DOrn(3)] was replaced by [DGlu(1)(Gly), DOrn(3)] as in cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)] GnRH (23, K-i = 4.2 nM), were approximately 100 and 25 times less potent in vivo, res pectively. Analogues with ring sizes of 18 {cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(Gly),D Cpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (24)} arid 19 {cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1 )(beta Ala),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (25)) atoms were also les s potent than 21 with slightly higher K-i values (1.5 and 2.2 nM, respectiv ely). These results suggested that the N-terminal tripeptide was likely to assume a folded conformation favoring the close proximity of the side chain s of residues 1 and 3. The dicyclic analogue dicyclo(1-3/ 4-10)[Ac-DAsp(1), DCpa(2),DLys(3),Asp(4),DNal(6),Dpr(10)] GnRH (26) was fully active at 500 m u g, with a K-i value of 1 nM. The in vivo potency of 26 was at least 10-fo ld less than that of monocyclic cyclo(1-3)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal( 6),DAla(10)]GnRH (5); this suggested the existence of unfavorable interacti ons between the now optimized and constrained (1-3) and (4-10) cyclic moiet ies that must interact as originally hypothesized. Tricyclo(1-3/4-10/5-8)[Ac-DGlu(1),DCpa(2), DLys(3),Asp(4),Glu(5),DNal(6),Ly s(8),Dpr(10)] GnRH (27) was inactive at 500 mu g/rat with a corresponding l ow affinity (K-i = 4.6 nM) when compared to those of the most potent analog ues (K-i < 0.5 nM).