Ec. Janowsky et al., Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases., N ENG J MED, 342(11), 2000, pp. 781-790
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: The postulated relation between silicone breast implants and th
e risk of connective-tissue and autoimmune diseases has generated intense m
edical and legal interest during the past decade. The salience of the issue
persists, despite the fact that a great deal of research has been conducte
d on this subject. To provide a stronger quantitative basis for addressing
the postulated relation, we applied several techniques of meta-analysis tha
t combine, compare, and summarize the results of existing relevant studies.
Methods: We searched data bases and reviewed citations in relevant articles
to identify studies that met prestated inclusion criteria. Nine cohort stu
dies, nine case-control studies, and two cross-sectional studies were inclu
ded in our meta-analyses. We conducted meta-analyses of the results of thes
e studies, both with and without adjustment for confounding factors, and a
separate analysis restricted to studies of silicone-gel-filled breast impla
nts. Finally, we estimated the annual number of new cases of connective-tis
sue disease that could be attributed to breast implants.
Results: There was no evidence that breast implants were associated with a
significant increase in the summary adjusted relative risk of individual co
nnective-tissue diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, 1.04 [95 percent confidence
interval, 0.72 to 1.51]; systemic lupus erythematosus, 0.65 [95 percent co
nfidence interval, 0.35 to 1.23]; scleroderma or systemic sclerosis, 1.01 [
95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.73]; and Sjogren's syndrome, 1.42
[95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 3.11]); all definite connective-t
issue diseases combined (0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 1.04
); or other autoimmune or rheumatic conditions (0.96; 95 percent confidence
interval, 0.74 to 1.25). Nor was there evidence of significantly increased
risk in the unadjusted analyses or in the analysis restricted to silicone-
gel-filled implants.
Conclusions: On the basis of our meta-analyses, there was no evidence of an
association between breast implants in general, or silicone-gel-filled bre
ast implants specifically, and any of the individual connective-tissue dise
ases, all definite connective-tissue diseases combined, or other autoimmune
or rheumatic conditions. From a public health perspective, breast implants
appear to have a minimal effect on the number of women in whom connective-
tissue diseases develop, and the elimination of implants would not be likel
y to reduce the incidence of connective-tissue diseases. (N Engl J Med 2000
;342:781-90.) (C)2000, Massachusetts Medical Society.