The Joyless Economy seeks to explain the paradox of rising consumption
and pervasive dissatifaction, and is thus often cited as a critique o
f consumer society. Yet it is rather ambivalent as critique. A less am
bivalent critique would be predicated on the existence of biases towar
d private consumption as against public consumption, savings, free tim
e, and the environment. These biases result from two sources: the impo
rtance of social comparison and the non-existence of a market in worki
ng hours. Because positional competitions occur far more readily aroun
d visible private consumer goods, these take a privileged place in exp
enditures. This process is compounded by the fact that employers syste
matically deny opportunities to trade income for leisure.