Sk. Swan et Mj. Hursting, The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of argatroban: Effects of age, gender, and hepatic or renal dysfunction, PHARMACOTHE, 20(3), 2000, pp. 318-329
Study Objective. To determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of
argatroban in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic or renal dysfunc
tion.
Design. Prospective, open-label study (studies 1 and 3); prospective, open-
label, parallel-group study (study 2).
Settings. Two research centers and an inpatient clinic.
Subjects. Study 1, healthy volunteers, study 2, healthy volunteers and volu
nteers with hepatic disease; study 3, volunteers with normal to severely im
paired renal function assigned to one of four groups based on creatinine cl
earance.
Intervention. Study 1, argatroban 125-pg/kg bolus followed by 4-hour contin
uous infusion of 2.5 mu g/kg/minute; study 2, 4-hour infusion of 2.5 mu g/k
g/minute (1.25 mu g/kg/minute in one patient with hepatic impairment); stud
y 3,5-mu g/kg/minute continuous infusion over 4 hours.
Measurements and Main Results. Blood samples were obtained to assess plasma
argatroban concentration, plasma activated partial thromboplastin time (aP
TT), and whole blood activated clotting time (ACT). Study 1: the pharmacoki
netic profile was well described by a two-compartment model with first-orde
r elimination; effect response and plasma argatroban concentrations were we
ll correlated. Mean +/- SD clearance, steady-state volume of distribution,
and half-life values (40 healthy volunteers) were 4.7 +/- 1.1 ml/minute/kg,
179.5 +/- 33.0 ml/kg, and 46.2 +/- 10.2 minutes, respectively. The only ef
fect of age or gender was the approximately 20% lower clearance in elderly
men versus elderly women, which did not translate to clinically or statisti
cally significant differences in pharmacodynamic response. Study 2. in pati
ents with hepatic impairment, area under the concentration versus time curv
e (AUC) from time zero (t(0)) to last measurable concentration, AUC from to
to infinity, maximum concentration, and half-life of argatroban were incre
ased approximately 2- to 3-fold; clearance was one-fourth that of healthy v
olunteers. For aPTT and ACT, AUC over time for mean effect and mean maximum
effect was higher in these volunteers. Study 3. no significant differences
were detected. All four groups had predictable response profiles over time
.
Conclusion. Argatroban should be easy to monitor and control, with little p
otential for underdosing or overdosing, regardless of age, gender, or renal
function. Dosing precautions are recommended, however, in patients with he
patic dysfunction.