K. Wilhelm et al., Evaluation of renal artery stenosis on CT-angiography: Comparison of various rendering techniques (AXIAL, MPR, MIP, SSD)., ROFO-F RONT, 172(2), 2000, pp. 161-167
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
Purpose: To evaluate the various reconstruction methods of helical-CT angio
graphy for the assessment of hemodynamically relevant renal artery stenoses
in comparison to i.a. DSA. Methods: In 76 renal arteries the reconstructio
n modalities AXIAL, MRP, MIP and SSD of helical-CT angiography were compare
d with the results of i.a. DSA for the determination of the grade and locat
ion of the stenosis, Results: The highest accuracy of stenosis grading was
76% with AXIAL reconstruction. In 8% of the cases grading of the stenosis w
as not evaluable by the AXIAL reconstruction, In these cases, a higher sens
itivity in the detection of hemodynamically relevant stenoses (>grade II, >
50%) was achieved with the reconstruction mode MPR (96%) than with MIP (92
%), In 51% of the cases the reconstruction mode SSD was not suitable for an
y diagnosis of renal artery stenosis because of overlying calcified plaques
. Conclusions: The evidence of hemodynamically relevant stenosis in helical
-CT angiography in comparison to i.a. DSA succeeds most reliable by using t
he reconstruction modality AXIAL in combination with MPR. The MIP reconstru
ction provides information about the anatomy of the renal arteries within o
ne image.