Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) present a means of intensively biologically tre
ating high COD or BOD wastewaters but, like other membrane processes, are c
onstrained by their tendency to foul. Fouling is the general term given to
those phenomena responsible for increasing membrane hydraulic resistance. I
t can be reduced by maintaining turbulent conditions, operating at sub-crit
ical flux and/or by the selection of a suitable fouling-resistant membrane
material.
The performance of various MBRs is appraised with reference to (i) fouling
propensity, and (ii) removal of organics and microorganisms. Energy costs f
or the two process configurations for MBRs, submerged and side-stream, are
reported with particular attention paid to aeration and recycle pumping cos
ts. A number of commercial plants treating domestic wastewater are describe
d, with further details of the most recent full-scale MBR for sewage treatm
ent tabulated.
It is shown that the side-stream configuration has a higher total energy co
st, by up to two orders of magnitude, compared with the submerged system du
e to the recycle component. The submerged configuration operates more cost
effectively than the side-stream configuration with respect to both energy
consumption and cleaning requirements, with aeration providing the main ope
rating cost component as it is required for both mixing and oxygen transfer
. On the other hand, the lower flux under which the submerged system operat
es implies a higher membrane area and thus a higher associated capital cost
. It is concluded that the MBR is a highly effective treatment process for
wastewater treatment in areas requiring a high quality effluent (such as di
scharge to bathing waters or water reuse) or specialisation in the microbia
l community (e.g, high strength liquors, effective nitrification). (C) 2000
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.