Dealing with difference: Researching health beliefs and behaviours of British Asian mothers

Authors
Citation
K. Reed, Dealing with difference: Researching health beliefs and behaviours of British Asian mothers, SOC RES ONL, 4(4), 2000, pp. NIL_220-NIL_234
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE
ISSN journal
13607804 → ACNP
Volume
4
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
NIL_220 - NIL_234
Database
ISI
SICI code
1360-7804(20000229)4:4<NIL_220:DWDRHB>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Contemporary sociology is faced by a central problem of conceptualising and rendering empirically operable the concept of difference without dissoluti on into perpetual plurality on the one hand, and recourse to fixed hierarch ical relations on the other. Drawing on attempts to operationalise research categories within a research project on the health beliefs and behaviours of South Asian mothers, the paper explores the difficulties of operating co ncepts of difference at epistemological analytical and methodological level s. For example, within the research there are difficulties in operationalis ing concepts of local/global difference and differences between western and non-western medical systems without fixing one in a privileged position re lative to the other or without seeing them as necessarily always equal. The research also raises questions of how to sample across multiple difference and develop interview and writing strategies which do not fix relations be tween researcher/researched in either equal or hierarchical relations. The paper draws on attempts to cope with these problems. It engages with post-m odern approaches to difference but stops short of complete deconstruction, developing these approaches instead within a dialectical framework. A diale ctical approach attempts to contextualise difference, recognising the inter relationship and contradiction between research categories of difference, t emporally locating hierarchies between them. Methodologically, it also stri ves to develop an approach which steers a course in between a position of r esearcher as 'expert' and a position where our knowledge of others is treat ed as inconceivable.