A case of pseudothrombocytopenia after infusion of abciximab in vivo and anticoagulant-independent platelet clumping after rechallenge with abciximabin vitro
M. Kozak et al., A case of pseudothrombocytopenia after infusion of abciximab in vivo and anticoagulant-independent platelet clumping after rechallenge with abciximabin vitro, WIEN KLIN W, 112(3), 2000, pp. 138-141
A 45-year old man was treated for unstable angina pectoris with percutaneou
s transluminal angioplasty and stenting of his left anterior descending cor
onary artery. The procedure was followed by infusion of abciximab. The pati
ent's automated platelet count in an EDTA-anticoagulated blood sample at ad
mission to the hospital was normal, but dropped to 5 x 10(9)/l three hours
after the procedure. The infusion of abciximab was stopped and the patient
received platelet transfusions although there were no signs of bleeding. Tw
o days later his platelet count was still low (37 x 10(9)/l) in an EDTA-ant
icoagulated blood sample, but normal (193 X 10(9)/l) in a heparin-anticoagu
lated sample. Platelet clumps were present only in the sample anticoagulate
d with EDTA, and pseudothrombocytopenia was diagnosed. The patient's recove
ry was uneventful. At follow-up visits four months and one year after disch
arge from hospital, the patient's blood samples were anticoagulated with th
ree different anticoagulants: EDTA, citrate and heparin. The platelet count
was normal in all three samples but after mixing with abciximab in vitro i
t dropped profoundly due to platelet clumping, regardless of the choice of
the anticoagulant. Our report raises two points: (a) one needs to consider
the possibility of pseudothrombocytopenia in a patient with a low automated
platelet count after infusion of abciximab but without signs of bleeding,
and (b) the in vitro results suggest that our patient who had initially res
ponded to abciximab with pseudothrombocytopenia could develop true thromboc
ytopenia after repeated exposure.