Histologic grade, including tubular formations, nuclear grade, and mitotic
activity, is a well-documented prognostic factor in breast cancer. In compa
rison with other prognostic parameters, the evaluation of histologic grade
is cheap and can be performed, in principle, in all cases of breast cancer.
One possible disadvantage is that the evaluation may vary between differen
t pathological departments. The aim of the present work was therefore to st
udy the reproducibility of the histologic grading system by distributing ha
ematoxylin-erythrosin-stained slides from 93 invasive breast cancers to the
seven pathology departments within the southern healthcare region of Swede
n. The evaluation was performed blindly and without any knowledge of other
clinical parameters. In 31% of the cases the same histologic grade was obta
ined for all departments. The overall mean kappa was 0.54, indicating a mod
erate reproducibility. Of the three factors included in histologic grade, t
he agreement was best for tubular formations and poorest for nuclear grade
and mitotic activity. The overall moderate reproducibility should be consid
ered when the clinical usefulness of histologic grading is compared with ot
her prognostic instruments.