Tuberous sclerosis: Differences between cerebral and cerebellar cortical tubers in a pediatric population

Citation
L. Marti-bonmati et al., Tuberous sclerosis: Differences between cerebral and cerebellar cortical tubers in a pediatric population, AM J NEUROR, 21(3), 2000, pp. 557-560
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01956108 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
557 - 560
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6108(200003)21:3<557:TSDBCA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Histologic evidence of cortical tubers is pathognom onic of tuberous sclerosis (TS) disease, Cerebellar tubers, however, are un commonly found, Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence and characteri stics of cerebellar tubers in a large series of pediatric patients with TS studied with MR imaging, In particular, their relationship with volume loss and age will be analyzed, METHODS: MR images of 34 children with TS and cortical tubers were reviewed . There were 17 female and 17 male patients. The mean age was 8.9 +/- 4.5 y ears (mean +/- SD), with a range from 2 to 14 years, The number and locatio n (supratentorial, infratentorial) of tubers and volume loss of the underly ing parenchyma were recorded, The relationship between tuber location, pati ent age, and number of tubers was studied using the Student's t test for in dependent samples. The relationship between tuber location and presence of volume loss was established using the Pearson chi(2) test. RESULTS: The mean number of cortical tubers was 14.3 +/- 8.5. Fifteen (44.1 %) patients had cerebellar tubers associated with cerebral lesions. Patient s with cerebellar and cerebral tubers had significantly more global cortica l lesions than did patients with isolated cerebral tubers (17.9 +/- 8.9 ver sus 11.4 +/- 7.2 tubers, P = .026), Patients with cerebellar tubers were si gnificantly older than those with isolated supratentorial tubers (11.3 +/- 3.4 versus 7.1 +/- 4.4 years, P = .005), In only four (11.8%) patients were tubers associated with focal parenchymal volume loss. The tubers in all of these cases were located in the cerebellum-indicating a significant relati onship with volume loss (Pearson chi(2) test, P = .017), CONCLUSION: In this series, cerebellar tubers were frequent and were always present in association with cerebral cortical tubers. They were seen in ol der children with a larger total number of tubers. Cerebellar tubers may be associated with focal volume loss.