N. Milpied et al., Humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) in post transplant B-lymphoproliferative disorder: A retrospective analysis on 32 patients, ANN ONCOL, 11, 2000, pp. 113-116
Background: B-lymphoproliferative post-transplant disorder (BLPD) is a seve
re complication of organ and bone marrow transplantation. The reduction of
immuno-suppressive therapy or surgery for localized disease may cure some B
LPDs. Other therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy and antiviral drugs
are toxic and of limited efficacy. Adoptive immunotherapy with donor T-cel
l infusions has yielded promising results but is, at the present time, easi
ly applicable only: in bone marrow-transplanted patients. Anti-B-cell Murin
e monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) have proven effective but are no longer ava
ilable for human use. We report the activity of a humanized anti CD 20 Mo A
b (Rituximab-MABTHERA(R) Roche) in 32 episodes of BLPD treated in 14 French
centers.
Patients and methods: Between November 1997 and September 1998, 32 patients
were diagnosed with BLPD. Twenty-six patients had undergone solid organ tr
ansplants (liver 8, kidney 8, heart 4, lung 3, heart lung 1, kidney-pancrea
s 1, liver-kidney 1) and six patients had received bone marrow transplantat
ions. The median age of the patients was 34 years (3-67 years) and the medi
an delay between graft and tumor 5 months (1-156 months). In organ recipien
ts, tumors were classified as polymorphic and monomorphic in 10 and 15 case
s. respectively; 4 of 6 bone marrow transplant recipients were treated with
out pathology documentation because of a rise in EBV load, fever and lymph
node enlargement. Tumors were associated with EBV in 22 of 26 tested cases.
Rituximab was used as first-line therapy in 30 patients (after reduction o
f immunosuppressive treatment in 27 patients) and as salvage therapy in 2 p
atients (after failure of chemotherapy). The median time from diagnosis of
BLPD to treatment with Rituximab was 14 days (1-110 days), Two patients rec
eived eight infusions, twenty-six patients foul infusions, one patient thre
e infusions and three patients two infusions of 375 mg/m(2).
Results: The tolerance of rituximab was good. The overall response rate was
69%, with 20 complete responses and 2 partial responses. In solid organ tr
ansplant the response rate was 65% (15 CR and 2 PR) while it was 83% in bon
e marrow-transplanted patients (5 CSR). With a median follow-up of 8 months
(1-16 months) 24 patients are still alive. The one-year protected survival
is 73%. Of the 22 patients who achieved response. 15 patients (11 solid or
gan transplant and 4 bone marrow transplant) are alive with no evidence of
disease, 4 patients relapsed a median of 7 months (3 10 months) after treat
ment and 3 died while in CR of concurrent diseases. Of the 10 patients a ho
did not respond to Rituximab 5 are alive with no evidence of disease after
salvage therapy.
Conclusions: The use of rituximab appears to be a safe and relatively effic
ient therapy in BLPDs. The results need to be confirmed in a prospective mu
lticentric trial.