Total rectal resection and complete mesorectum excision followed by coloendoanal anastomosis as the optimal treatment for low rectal cancer: The experience of the National Cancer Institute of Milano
E. Leo et al., Total rectal resection and complete mesorectum excision followed by coloendoanal anastomosis as the optimal treatment for low rectal cancer: The experience of the National Cancer Institute of Milano, ANN SURG O, 7(2), 2000, pp. 125-132
Background: At present, abdominoperineal resection remains the most diffuse
method of treatment of very low rectal cancer. Today, we can avoid this me
thod in some patients by using a sphincter-saving procedure.
Methods: From March 1990 to January 1999, 273 consecutive total rectal rese
ctions and coloendoanal anastomoses were performed at our Institute; this s
tudy concerns 141 consecutive patients treated for a primary adenocarcinoma
of the distal rectum, from 3.5 to 8 cm from the anal verge. Patient strati
fication, based on definitive pathological report, was 31 Dukes' stage A (T
2N0), 44 stage B (T3N0), and 66 stage C (T2N+-T3N+).
Results: Overall recurrence rate was 9.2%; postoperative morbidity attribut
able to the procedure was low. A perfect continence was documented in 61% o
f cases. The only pathological factor related to local recurrence rate is p
eritumoral lymphocytic reaction inside and around the tumor (P = .0005 and
.031) independently from the number of metastatic lymph nodes, depth of fat
ty tissue infiltration, and lymphatic and venous neoplastic emboli. The min
imum follow-up time is 12 months.
Conclusions: Our data, in accordance with other authors, seem to highlight
the relevant role that a well-practiced surgery, together with accurate inf
ormation on the spreading of this disease, has in achieving an optimal loca
l control of cancer.