Although Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1997) suggests that teacher mode
ling would be one of the most effective methods to encourage food acceptanc
e by preschool children, opinions of experienced teachers have not yet been
sampled, teacher modeling has rarely been examined experimentally, and it
has produced inconsistent results. The present study considers opinions of
teachers and conditions under which teacher modeling is effective.
Study 1 was a questionnaire in which preschool teachers (N = 58) were found
to rate modeling as the most effective of five teacher actions to encourag
e children's food acceptance.
Study 2 and Study 3 were quasi-experiments that found silent teacher modeli
ng ineffective to encourage either familiar food acceptance (N = 34; 18 boy
s, 16 girls) or new food acceptance (N = 23; 13 boys, 10 girls). Children's
new food acceptance was greatest in the first meal and then rapidly droppe
d, suggesting a "novelty response" rather than the expected neophobia. No g
ender differences were found in response to silent teacher modeling.
Study 4 was a repeated-measures quasi-experiment that found enthusiastic te
acher modeling ("Mmm! I love mangos!") could maintain new food acceptance a
cross five meals, again with no gender differences in response to teacher m
odeling (N = 26; 12 boys, 14 girls).
Study 5 found that with the addition of a competing peer model, however, ev
en enthusiastic teacher modeling was no longer effective to encourage new f
ood acceptance and gender differences appeared, with girls more responsive
to the peer model (N = 14; 6 boys, 8 girls). Thus, to encourage children's
new food acceptance, present results suggest that teachers provide enthusia
stic modeling rather than silent modeling, apply such enthusiastic modeling
during the first five meals before children's "novelty response" to new fo
ods drops, and avoid placing competing peer models at the same table with p
icky eaters, especially girls. (C) 2000 Academic Press.