Effect of posture on popliteal artery hemodynamics

Citation
Kt. Delis et al., Effect of posture on popliteal artery hemodynamics, ARCH SURG, 135(3), 2000, pp. 265-269
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00040010 → ACNP
Volume
135
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
265 - 269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(200003)135:3<265:EOPOPA>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Hypothesis: Marked peripheral vasodilation and rubor characterize criticall y ischemic limbs on dependency. We believe that intermittent claudication i s also associated with peripheral hemodynamic changes on postural alteratio n, which differ distinctly from normal. Evaluation of such differences and understanding of the underlying physiological derangements may be essential in the development of treatments for intermittent claudication. We compara tively assess the effect of posture on lower limb arterial hemodynamics in normal subjects and in patients with intermittent claudication (or Fontaine II) due to peripheral vascular disease, determined in the popliteal artery . Design: A cohort study. Setting: A university-associated tertiary care hospital. Patients: Thirty-seven legs of 29 normal subjects (group A) and 50 legs of 36 patients with intermittent claudication (ankle-brachial index range, 0.3 9-0.76; median, 0.57) (group B). Interventions: Popliteal artery volume flow (vFl), mean velocity, and lumin al diameter were measured on (1) recumbency, (2) sitting, and (3) return to recumbency in groups A and B using color duplex imaging. Main Outcome Measures: The pulsatility index, peak systolic velocity, and e nd diastolic velocity (EDV) were measured on (1) recumbency, (2) sitting, a nd (3) return to recumbency. Results: Popliteal artery vFl in normal subjects decreased from 110 +/- 43 mL/min on recumbency to 57 +/- 27 mL/min on sitting (P<.001) and returned t o 111 +/- 46 mL/min on resumption of recumbency (P<.001). Similarly, in pat ients with intermittent claudication, vFl decreased from 113 +/- 52 mL/min on recumbency to 76 +/- 41 mL/min on sitting (P<.001) and increased on resu mption of recumbency to 114 +/- 53 mL/min (P<.001). There was no difference (P = .97) in the vFl between the study groups on recumbency, but sitting v Fl in normal subjects was significantly lower than in patients with intermi ttent claudication (P = .04). The mean velocity, peak systolic velocity, an d EDV displayed a similar pattern of change as vFl. The pulsatility index i n both groups increased significantly on sitting (P<.001) and decreased on return to recumbency (P<.001). All data are given as mean +/- SD. Conclusions: Lower limb arterial vFl, mean velocity, peak systolic velocity , and EDV decrease significantly (P<.001) when posture is altered from recu mbency to sitting, in normal subjects and in patients with intermittent cla udication. A decrease in the EDV and an increase in the pulsatility index o n sitting indicate enhancement of arterial resistance to Row secondary to p eripheral vasoconstriction. Quantitative differences between the groups in vFl (P<.04), EDV (P<.01), and pulsatility index (P<.001) on dependency indi cate that the orthostatic vasoactive response in patients with intermittent claudication is significantly subdued, reflecting a marked derangement in venoarteriolar response.