Emergency medical services (EMS) vs non-EMS transport of critically injured patients - A prospective evaluation

Citation
Ee. Cornwell et al., Emergency medical services (EMS) vs non-EMS transport of critically injured patients - A prospective evaluation, ARCH SURG, 135(3), 2000, pp. 315-319
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00040010 → ACNP
Volume
135
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
315 - 319
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(200003)135:3<315:EMS(VN>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background: A previous report of 5782 trauma patients demonstrated higher m ortality among those transported by emergency medical services (EMS) than a mong their non-EMS-transported counterparts. Hypothesis: Trauma patients who are transported by EMS and those who are no t differ in the injury-to-hospital arrival time interval. Design: Prospective cohort-matched observation study. Setting: Level I trauma center, multidisciplinary study group. Patients: All non-EMS patients were matched with the next appropriate EMS p atient by an investigator who was unaware of the outcome and mode of transp ort. Every 10th EMS patient with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 13 or gr eater was also randomly enrolled. Matching characteristics included age, IS S, mechanism of injury, head Abbreviated Injury Score, and presence of hypo tension. An interview protocol was developed to determine the time of injur y. Interview responses from patients, witnesses, and friends were combined with data obtained from police, sheriff, and medical examiner reports. Main Outcome Measures: Time to the hospital, mortality, morbidity, and leng th of stay. Results: A total of 103 patients were enrolled (38 non-EMS, 38 EMS matched, 27 random EMS). Injury time was estimated using all available data made on 100 patients (97%). Independent raters agreed in 81% of cases. Deaths, com plications, and length of hospital stay were similar between the EMS- and n on-EMS-transported groups. Although time intervals were similar among the g roups overall, more critically injured non-EMS patients (ISS greater than o r equal to 13) got themselves to the trauma center in less time than their EMS counterparts (15 minutes vs 28 minutes; P<.05). Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach can be utilized, and an interview protocol created to determine actual time of injury. Critically injured no n-EMS-transported patients (ISS greater than or equal to 13) arrived at the hospital earlier after their injuries.