S. Wood et al., Selective attention fails to alter the dichotic listening lag effect: Evidence that the lag effect is preattentional, BRAIN LANG, 71(3), 2000, pp. 373-390
Berlin et al. (1973) reported that either stimulus from a dichotic pair of
consonant-vowel syllables is processed preferentially when its presentation
is delayed by 30-60 ms. in the first of three experiments with 60 normal r
ight-handed adults, we replicated the Berlin et al. "lag effect," but only
for asynchronies between 60 and 90 ms. In Experiment 2 subjects focused att
ention selectively on one ear. The results indicated that focused attention
and stimulus asynchrony have additive effects: Performance improved at the
attended ear irrespective of stimulus asynchrony, but the lag effect remai
ned unchanged relative to the divided-attention condition; Experiment 3 ent
ailed a signal detection task that allowed separate analysis of detection a
nd localization accuracy. As in previous studies, selective attention to on
e ear increased the accuracy of localization but not detection at the atten
ded ear. Both dependent measures indicated a lag effect that remained invar
iant as attention was manipulated. These findings imply that the lag effect
is attributable to a preattentional stage of auditory processing. (C) 2000
Academic Press.