Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography in a tertiary referral centre

Citation
Al. Clark et al., Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography in a tertiary referral centre, BR J RADIOL, 73(866), 2000, pp. 184-189
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00071285 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
866
Year of publication
2000
Pages
184 - 189
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Cardiac catheterization is carried out by an increasing number of operators from district hospitals as well as tertiary referral centres. Procedures a re not standardized and are at the discretion of individual operators. The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of patient radiation dose and screening times associated with diagnostic cardiac catheterization, an d explore determinants of radiation dose to patients and staff. Data were c ollected from 1337 diagnostic procedures carried out in two cardiac cathete rization laboratories from January to June 1998. Screening time and radiati on dose measured by dose-area product (DAP) meter were recorded. Status of the operator and type of investigation were determined. 33 operators had pe rformed at least 15 left ventriculograms with coronary angiography (total 9 44 procedures). The average (+/-SD) was 40 (+/-22) per operator. Screening times for individual operators varied from 2.0 (+/-1.3) min to 5.0 (+/-4.3) min with no relationship between time and number of cases. Consultants and visiting physicians had longer screening times and greater patient DAP rea dings. In comparison with 115 cases of coronary angiography alone, left ven triculography increased DAP reading from 14.24 (+/-11.7) Gy cm(2) to 20.26 (+/-0.47) Gy cm(2) (p<0.0001). In 106 cases of coronary artery bypass graft angiography, an aortogram (n=53) did not add significantly to radiation do se or screening time. A right heart catheter added approximately 5 min to s creening time (9.13 (+/-0.63) min with right heart (n=83) vs 3.96 (+/-0.12) min without right heart (n=1234)), but did not affect radiation dose signi ficantly. There is a wide range of screening times and radiation doses rela ted to diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Visiting and consultant staff us e greater radiation doses. Left ventriculography adds significantly to pati ents' radiation exposure. Aortography does not add significantly to radiati on dose in cases of graft angiography.