Equity ownership and the duty of care: Convergence, revolution, or evolution?

The fiduciary duty of care is one of the pillars of Delaware corporate law. Under the traditional corporate model, courts police the duty of care by e xamining the process directors followed in rendering a decision. This model has weaknesses, including the ease with which an adequate record may be co nstructed and the lack of any necessary connection between procedural ritua ls and optimal decision making. A viable and compelling alternative would b e for a court to consider whether the directors who made the decision also were substantial stockholders. If so, then the directors' enlightened self- interest should have operated to ensure that the decision reached was the b est option available. Courts therefore could adopt a rebuttable presumption that directors who also are substantial stockholders have acted with due c are. Three lines of authority are converging in support of such a presumpti on. Rather than a revolutionary change, such a presumption would represent an evolutionary development in the analysis of directors' fiduciary duties.