Mbom. Honnebier et al., Closure of palatal fistula with a local mucoperiosteal flap lined with buccal mucosal graft, CLEF PAL-CR, 37(2), 2000, pp. 127-129
Objective: Oro-nasal fistula is a common complication of palatoplasty. Curr
ent methods for fistula repair utilize mucoperiosteal flaps or pedicled fla
ps. These procedures are often cumbersome and leave a raw nasal surface, wh
ich may increase the incidence of postoperative risks and problems. In addi
tion, the recurrence rate of the fistula is as high as 34%, We propose a si
mple two-layer method of fistula repair to avoid recurrences.
Design: A standard mucoperiosteal flap is raised on the oral side. A buccal
mucosal graft is harvested from the cheeks and sutured to the nasal side o
f the flap that is then inset into the fistula,
Setting: Patients were either referred to the senior author's private pract
ice (four patients) or were patients who had previously been operated on by
the senior author himself (three patients).
Subjects: Study subjects consisted of seven patients, four males and three
females, ages 14 months to 8 years. All patients had previously undergone c
left palate repair, complicated by subsequent oro-nasal fistula formation.
Interventions: All patients underwent oro-nasal fistula repair under genera
l anesthesia with a local mucoperiosteal flap lined with buccal mucosal gra
fts placed on the nasal side of the flap.
Results: In all cases, the fistula was completely closed at first attempt w
ithout complications. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years, with
out evidence of recurrence.
Conclusions: Our proposed surgical procedure for fistula closure using a st
andard mucoperiosteal flap lined with a buccal mucosal graft is a suitable
alternative for the repair of postpalatoplasty oro-nasal fistulas, Further
study and long-term follow-up is needed to establish this method as a new s
tandard form of repair.