PURPOSE: Patients with fecal incontinence not amenable to simple repair may
have to undergo major reconstructive surgery or resort to a stoma. Sacral
nerve stimulation is an alternative approach that may diminish incontinence
by altering sphincter and rectal motor function. This study is the first d
ouble-blind trial examining the effectiveness of this therapy. METHODS: Two
patients with passive fecal incontinence who had been implanted for nine m
onths with a permanent sacral nerve stimulator and electrode were studied u
sing fecal incontinence diaries, anorectal physiological tests, and quality
-of-life assessments (SF-36 health survey). The trial period consisted of t
wo two-week periods, with the stimulator turned on for two weeks and off fo
r two weeks. The main investigator and the patients were blinded to the sta
tus of the stimulator. RESULTS: There was a dramatic difference between the
number and severity of episodes of incontinence when the stimulator was tu
rned on vs. turned off (Patient 1, 20 vs. 2 episodes; Patient 2, 4 vs. 0 ep
isodes; off vs. on). There was an increase in squeeze pressure (Patient 1,
70 vs. 100 cm H2O; Patient 2, 60 vs. 90 cm H2O; off vs. on), with moderate
increases in resting pressure and rectal threshold and urge volumes. Qualit
y-of-life measurements showed a marked improvement prestimulation vs. nine
months after permanent stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: There is a marked, unequiv
ocal improvement in symptoms of fecal incontinence with sacral nerve stimul
ation shown in this double-blind crossover trial. Sacral nerve stimulation
improves the quality of life in selected patients with fecal incontinence.