Whether bacteria live or die in periapical lesions of endodontic origin is
debated. Sampling of periapical bacteria is difficult due to possible conta
mination from the indigenous microflora. The aim of this study was to exami
ne whether bacteria were present in periapical lesions of asymptomatic teet
h before sampling or were transferred there during sampling. Thirty patient
s with root-filled teeth and periapical radiolucencies were divided into tw
o groups, each containing 15 patients. In Group 1, a marginal incision was
made to explore the periapical lesion. In Group 2, a submarginal incision w
as made. Before incision, the gingiva and mucosa were washed with 0.2% chlo
rhexidine gluconate. Bacterial samples were taken from the mucosa before re
flecting the flap, and from the alveolar bone and the periapical lesion imm
ediately after. AU samples were cultured anaerobically on all-purpose and s
elective media. In Group 1, 12 of the 15 patients (80%) yielded bacteria fr
om their mucosal samples despite the chlorhexidine wash. Bacterial growth w
as observed in all samples (100%) from the alveolar bone while the periapic
al lesions gave bacterial growth in 11 of 15 cases (73%). In Group 2, bacte
ria were cultured from the mucosa in 11 of 15 (73%) patients. Three samples
(20%) from the alveolar bone and 10 from the periapical lesions (67%) gave
positive growth. The predominant cultivable bacteria were anaerobic. Pheno
typic profiling, performed with the data-based API bioMerieux system, indic
ated that the sampling technique used prevented mucosal bacteria from reach
ing the exposed bone and the periapical lesions. Profiling also indicated t
hat following marginal incision, bacteria from the periodontal pocket might
have reached the underlying tissues by surgeon-released bacteremia or dire
ct translocation. Most organisms detected in the periapical lesions were cl
early different from the bacteria present at neighboring sites and appeared
to have been there before sampling.