Tj. Bandosz et al., Unmodified versus caustics-impregnated carbons for control of hydrogen sulfide emissions from sewage treatment plants, ENV SCI TEC, 34(6), 2000, pp. 1069-1074
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
Unmodified and caustic-impregnated carbons were compared as adsorbents for
hydrogen sulfide in the North River Water Pollution Control Plant in New Yo
rk City over a period of 2 years. The carbons were characterized using acce
lerated H2S breakthrough capacity tests, sorption of nitrogen, potentiometr
ic titration, and thermal analysis. The accelerated laboratory tests indica
te that the initial capacity of caustic-impregnated carbons exceeds that of
unmodified carbon, but the nature of real-life challenge streams, particul
arly their lower H2S concentrations, nullifies this advantage. As the caust
ic content of the impregnated carbon is consumed, the situation reverses, a
nd the unmodified carbon becomes more effective. When the concentration of
H2S is low, the developed surface area and pore volume along with the affin
ity to retain water create a favorable environment for dissociative adsorpt
ion of hydrogen sulfide and its oxidation to elemental sulfur, S4+, and S6. In the case of the caustic carbon, the catalytic impact of the carbon sur
face is limited, and its good performance lasts only while active base is p
resent. The results also show the significant differences in performance of
unmodified carbons due to combined effects of their porosity and surface c
hemistry.