Efficacy of low and standard midazolam doses for gastroscopy. A randomized, double-blind study

Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of intraveno us midazolam (35 and 70 mu g/kg) compared to placebo in patients undergoing gastroscopy. Patients and methods Sixty patients scheduled for diagnostic gastroscopy we re selected according to factors previously reported to affect: tolerance ( Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11:201 - 204) and were randomly assigned to receive premedication with midazolam 35 mu g/kg iv, midazolam 70 mu g/kg iv or placebo iv. Oxygen saturation was continuously monitored during the procedure. Patients' tolerance, time to discharge and post-sedative inconve nience were evaluated using visual analogue scales and a questionnaire. Results Patients receiving either dose of midazolam showed better tolerance of gastroscopy than those receiving the placebo. Fewer patients receiving 70 or 35 mu g/kg of midazolam were reluctant to undergo a further gastrosco py compared to those receiving the placebo (2, 1 and 9 patients respectivel y, P = 0.01). Compared to patients receiving midazolam 70 mu g/kg, those re ceiving midazolam 35 mu g/kg were discharged earlier (29.3 +/- 14.4 versus 43.1 +/- 12.4 min respectively, P< 0.001), experienced less post-sedative i nconvenience (8 versus 15 patients slept for > 1 h at home respectively, P = 0.02), and suffered fewer clinically relevant desaturation episodes (< 90 %) (0 versus 5 patients respectively, P = 0.04), Conclusions Low doses of intravenous midazolam (35 mu g/kg) are adequate an d safe when sedation is indicated for gastroscopy, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepa tol 12:187-190 (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.