Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus

Citation
V. Viciano et al., Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus, EURO J SURG, 166(3), 2000, pp. 229-232
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
11024151 → ACNP
Volume
166
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
229 - 232
Database
ISI
SICI code
1102-4151(200003)166:3<229:EOHDOH>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound manage ment after excision of pilonidal sinus Design: Prospective randomised trial. Setting. District hospital, Spain. Patients: 38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus. Interventions: Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel(R) (n = 12) and Varihesive(R) (n = 11) Main outcome measures: Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pa in, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence. Results: Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control grou p, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups comb ined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postopera tive cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no cl inical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patient s in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for pa tients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shor ten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.