Objective: To determine whether there are seasonal fluctuations in eating p
athology in a nonclinical population. Method: The Eating Attitudes Test (EA
T) was completed by 322 subjects during winter and again during summer. Sum
mer and winter responses were compared to investigate differences in EAT to
tal and subscale scores and for individual EAT items. Numbers of subjects f
luctuating across the seasons by more than 2 SDs of the cohort's scores wer
e identified. Results: The cohort showed no significant seasonal change on
EAT-40 totals, EAT-26 totals, or within the EAT subscales. There were signi
ficant (p < .025) seasonal fluctuations on four of the EAT-40 questions. Fo
r individual respondents, there was no greater likelihood of scoring signif
icantly higher in the winter than in the summer. Discussion: Clinically sig
nificant seasonal fluctuations in eating pathology on the EAT did not occur
in this nonclinical population. It is debatable whether items within the E
AT which show significant seasonal fluctuations should be retained or disca
rded. (C) 2000 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.