V. Moiseenko et al., Normal tissue complication probabilities: Dependence on choice of biological model and dose-volume histogram reduction scheme, INT J RAD O, 46(4), 2000, pp. 983-993
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of dose-volume histogram (DVH) reduction sc
hemes and models of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) on rankin
g of radiation treatment plans.
Methods and Materials: Data for liver complications in humans and for spina
l cord in rats were used to derive input parameters of four different NTCP
models. DVH reduction was performed using two schemes: "effective volume" a
nd "preferred Lyman". DVHs for competing treatment plans were derived from
a sample DVH by varying dose uniformity in a high dose region so that the o
btained cumulative DVHs intersected. Treatment plans were ranked according
to the calculated NTCP values.
Results: Whenever the preferred Lyman scheme was used to reduce the DVH, co
mpeting plans were indistinguishable as long as the mean dose was constant.
The effective volume DVH reduction scheme did allow us to distinguish betw
een these competing treatment plans. However, plan ranking depended on the
radiobiological model used and its input parameters.
Conclusions: Dose escalation will be a significant part of radiation treatm
ent planning using new technologies, such as 3-D conformal radiotherapy and
tomotherapy. Such dose escalation will depend on how the dose distribution
s in organs at risk are interpreted in terms of expected complication proba
bilities. The present study indicates considerable variability in predicted
NTCP values because of the methods used for DVH reduction and radiobiologi
cal models and their input parameters. Animal studies and collection of sta
ndardized clinical data are needed to ascertain the effects of non-uniform
dose distributions and to test the validity of the models currently in use.
(C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.