Thought Experiments (TEs) have a long history of use in science. It is sugg
ested that, if science education is to be related as clearly as possible to
science, then TEs must play an appropriate part. The relationship between
TEs and experiments (Es) is explored. A typology of TEs is presented with e
xamples drawn from the history of physics. The potential uses of the variou
s types of TEs in bringing about conceptual development and as a complement
to conventional practical work are addressed. The analysis of three typica
l school and higher-education level physics textbooks shows that the potent
ials identified are, at present, not realised. Indeed, elements of TE desig
n were found to be integrated with other pedagogic devices into what we hav
e termed 'thought simulations' (TSs). In these, the behaviour of a phenomen
on was illustrated rather than predicted and tested, theory was assumed and
embedded rather than being tentative and emergent, and the outcome was ass
umed rather than being anticipated.