In this article, the authors report data from four states that have compute
rized their long-term care ombudsman databases and are using the same softw
are. The authors explore the apparent differences among these four states t
o encourage critical thinking in interpreting the meaning of these data. Ju
st as a national ombudsman database draws closer, so does the need for prac
titioners, researchers, educators, and policy makers to be vigilant in unde
rstanding that data must be contextualized. Otherwise, premature and inaccu
rate conclusions may be drawn. Critically important is the link between tho
se persons who analyze and interpret and the ombudsman practitioners who co
llect and report these data.