Computer-driven systems for constructing composite faces of suspects (E-fit
; Mac-a-Mug) have largely replaced mechanical systems (Photofit; the Identi
kit) in police use, yet little is known of their comparative effectiveness
in rendering an accurate likeness. Participants (N = 24) constructed 2 of 4
familiar or unfamiliar faces, for one of which they used Photofit and for
the other, E-fit. A likeness of each face was made first under target-absen
t conditions and then with photographs of the target present. The accuracy
of the resulting composites was assessed by familiarity ratings, names elic
ited, and matching accuracy. The computer-driven system showed consistent s
uperiority only when a familiar face was constructed in the presence of pho
tographs; when participants worked from memory, E-fit was no better than Ph
otofit. The implications of these findings for theories of face retrieval a
nd the operational use of composites are discussed.