This study is based upon a new morphometric technique providing both size a
nd shape variables. It has been applied to 189 pelvic bones of extant human
s and African apes as well as to 13 hominid pelvic bones of various taxonom
ic status. The main aim of this work is to include such fossil bones in the
same study in order to set a synthetic comparison of their shape in the li
ght of the yardstick given by the African ape/human pelvic bone comparison.
To do so, ratio diagrams are chosen because they are simple and very expre
ssive tools with which to present such comparisons. Shape differences are v
ery well illustrated and quantified by this technique. The ilium appears to
be the most different of the three parts of the pelvic bone. Compared to t
hese differences, discrepancies between fossil hominid and extant human bon
es are of a totally different scale. This shows the architectural unity rel
ated to the acquisition of bipedalism by hominids. It is nonetheless possib
le to detect two levels of difference. The first separates Australopithecus
from Homo and could be seen as reflecting locomotor differences between bo
th genera. The second splits both Homo erectus and Neanderthal from modem h
uman pelvic bones. It appears from the hominid fossil record of pelvic bone
s that two periods of stasis exist and are separated by a period of very ra
pid evolution corresponding to the emergence of the genus Homo. We are of t
he opinion that the same could be true for the split between African ape an
d hominid lineages at the end of the Miocene. (C) 2000 Academic Press.