Pya. Ding et al., Does Chinese ethnicity affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics ofangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?, J HUM HYPER, 14(3), 2000, pp. 163-170
Information from clinical and pharmacokinetic studies of angiotensin-conver
ting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) has come from subjects who are mostly male a
nd Caucasian, but the use of ACEIs extends to populations worldwide. Signif
icant differences between Chinese in general and male Caucasians have been
demonstrated in the pharmacokinetics/dynamics of other drug classes that co
uld have implications for the use of ACEIs in the Chinese population. These
include: significant Chinese/Caucasian genetic variation in the renin-angi
otensin system based on an insertion/deletion (O/D) polymorphism of the ACE
gene; the genetic determination of plasma ACE activity in the Chinese popu
lation; and genetic factors involving the disease substrate which may also
influence the response to treatment. Oral and IV pharmacokinetic data from
various studies of Chinese and Caucasian subjects are available for cilazap
ril, fosinopril, and perindopril, and pharmacodynamic data are available fo
r eight different ACEIs. Based on these data, there are few differences amo
ng the pharmacokinetics of ACEIs between Chinese and Caucasians. Most ACEIs
showed good blood pressure lowering efficacy in Chinese (benazepril, enala
pril, fosinopril and spirapril), with perhaps less blood pressure lowering
with cilazapril or a relatively shorter-term effect with cilazapril or peri
ndopril compared to Caucasions. Chinese experience more cough from ACEIs (c
aptopril and enalapril) than Caucasians, Data suggest that fosinopril may n
ot induce cough in as many subjects as other ACEIs, and this seems to be tr
ue of Chinese as well. The mechanism, currently unknown, could involve fosi
nopril's dual elimination pathway (hepatic and renal), Pharmacokinetic data
also support the use of fosinopril in congestive heart failure where elimi
nation pathways may be impaired. In conclusion, ethnic differences between
Chinese and Caucasians with respect to ACE and AGT gene polymorphism, which
might be expected to differentially affect the action of ACEIs in these tw
o ethnic groups, do not, in fact, have such an effect. Rather, differences
among the ACEIs appear to be more important.