Cj. Bulpitt et al., Bisoprolol and nifedipine retard in elderly hypertensive patients: effect on quality of life, J HUM HYPER, 14(3), 2000, pp. 205-212
Subjects over the age 60 with sustained sitting diastolic pressures of 95-1
15 mm Hg were randomised to a regime based on bisoprolol (n = 368) or nifed
ipine retard (n = 379) for 24 weeks. The goal diastolic pressure was less t
han or equal to 90 mm Hg and to achieve this, double-blind medication could
be doubled (5/10 mg bisoprolol, 40/80 mg nifedipine retard) or hydrochloro
thiazide 25 mg (unblinded) could be added to the higher dose. In an intenti
on-to-treat analysis, 309 subjects in both the bisoprolol and nifedipine re
tard treated group provided at least a baseline and a second quality of lif
e assessment (82%), An excess of symptoms was observed in the nifedipine gr
oup for oedema of the legs, nocturia, constipation, racing heart and heart
thumping. Fewer patients reported wheeze in the nifedipine group. For quali
ty of life, there were no statistically significant differences between the
two groups after 8 weeks, However, when analysing the results of the last
available assessment (usually at 24 weeks) there were significant (P < 0.05
) improvements in tension/anxiety, anger/hostility, vigour/activity, and co
nfusion/bewilderment, assessed by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) in pati
ents receiving bisoprolol in comparison to those receiving nifedipine retar
d. The Sickness Impact Profile and objective tests of cognitive function di
d not differ statistically between the two groups, Quality of life was main
tained at a good level on both treatments with advantages for bisoprolol in
certain areas.