Newer applied macroeconometric models have adopted a mixture of paradigms t
o capture at least the major differences between the behavior of financial
markets and markets for commodities and for factors. Thus, in the Murphy Mo
del of the Australian macroeconomy (MM), rational expectations and very rap
id adjustment are assumed to apply in markets for financial assets, but fri
ctions and departures from rationality manifest themselves in the short-ter
m behavior of other markets. A popular story for the reaction of exchange a
nd interest rates to monetary shocks is provided by Dornbusch's 1976 oversh
ooting exchange rate model (DBM). The rational-expectations version of this
archetypal model underpins MM, yet the dynamic adjustment paths of variabl
es in MM differ markedly from those in DBM. A leading case in point is the
exchange rate which in MM actually undershoots its new equilibrium value af
ter the injection of a monetary shock. This paper gives a simplified accoun
t of how the differences come about. The emphasis is not so much on theoret
ical rigor as on providing a convincing practical demonstration. Using the
simplest form of DBM as a starting point, it is shown how one can progressi
vely develop a miniature model exhibiting an MM-like response to a monetary
shock. The key idea in this development is that aggregate demand does not
respond instantaneously to shocks in the macroeconomic environment. The veh
icle used to implement the numerical miniature model is a computer spreadsh
eet. Although the specifics relate to MM, the generics of this development
seem likely to be applicable to most models adopting the mixture of paradig
ms identified above. This conclusion survives the current proclivity to rep
lace Dornbusch's money demand function in the larger models by a policy rea
ction function in which interest rates are manipulated to control inflation
. (C) 2000 Society for Policy Modeling. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.