Objectives: This study evaluates the association between use of professiona
lly applied topical fluoride and use of interproximal restorations in prima
ry and permanent teeth of children. Methods: Insurance claims from 15,190 c
hildren, for treatment provided by 1,556 different dentists, were analyzed
to look for associations between frequency of use of professionally applied
topical fluoride and use of interproximal restorations. The average follow
-up period for the children included in the analysis was 5.3 years, with th
e range from 3.0 to 7.9 years. Results: Both tabular and regression results
failed to demonstrate an association between frequency of use of professio
nally applied topical fluoride and use of interproximal restorations in eit
her the primary or permanent dentition. The most powerful predictor of rest
orative care for these children was the overall propensity of the dentist t
o place restorations in children. Conclusions: In this group of insured chi
ldren, we were unable to find an association between the frequency of use o
f professionally applied topical fluoride and restorative care. Further, de
spite numerous recommendations that professionally applied topical fluoride
s should be used only in moderate- and high-caries children, approximately
two-thirds of these children received topical fluoride at every recall visi
t, nearly two times per year.